Broadest Ecosystem
Every layer of the AI stack is accelerated on NVIDIA - CUDA libraries, open-source frameworks, SDKs, and models - with the broadest community and ISV support.
Easy-to-Adopt Tools
NVIDIA and the open-source community partner closely to optimize popular AI tools like ComfyUI, Hermes, llama.cpp, Ollama, ONNX, OpenClaw, PyTorch, vLLM and more. These tools can be installed easily and run on the same CUDA stack across NVIDIA local and cloud GPUs. Day 0 Support for Latest Models
From LLMs to image generators, new open source models run fast on NVIDIA GPUs from day 0 due to close c
Choose hardware based on operating system, available GPU or unified memory, model size, and workflow. Prototype on NVIDIA DGX Spark™, run AI and agent workflows on GeForce RTX™, NVIDIA RTX Spark™ or NVIDIA RTX PRO™, and scale to NVIDIA DGX Station™ for larger local models and long-running agents. Best For
System Role
Memory
OS
Form Factor
Model Capacity
NVIDIA RTX Spark
Prototype & Test Large AI Models and Agents
Single Lightweight System
Up to 128GB Unified
Windows
Laptop / Compact Desktop
Up to 200 B
NVIDIA DGX Spark
Prototype & Test Large AI Models and Agents
Companion System
Up to 128GB
The Ising Calibration 1.5 model is trained on data generated from partner contributions across multiple qubit modalities, including superconducting qubits, quantum dots, ions, neutral atoms, electrons on Helium, and others specializing in calibration and control.
How is Ising Calibration 1.5 performance evaluated?
Performance of Ising Calibration 1.5 is evaluated using the QCalEval benchmark, which measures a model’s ability to interpret experimental results, classify outcomes, evaluate significance, assess fit quality and key features, and recommend next steps. For additional details on the benchmark, model architecture, and evaluation results, see QCalEval: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Quantum Calibration Plot Understanding. The evaluation covers both zero-shot and in-context learning (ICL). Zero-shot reasoning analyzes results independently, while ICL evaluates results in the context of re