Search

Showing top 74 results for "AI text detectability"

People also ask

What about false positives?

In his announcement, Best admitted that the AI detection tool is “not perfect,” but cited independent research that found Pangram’s software was 97.5% accurate in detecting fully generated AI text. The University of Maryland found that Pangram was 99.3% accurate in identifying “humanized AI-generated text,” which basically means a human has rewritten or paraphrased AI content. Substack writers who do not use AI are understandably concerned about being incorrectly labeled as AI-assisted authors. As a result, the risk of false positives is a significant issue. Substack said creators can scan the

I Test-Drove Substack’s New AI Detection Tool, and It Mostly Worked - CNET