… Anthropic will provide Claude access to up to 60 NAIRL-affiliated researchers, supporting work on AI safety, model evaluation, alignment, robustness, and broader frontier AI research. …
… As a first step to understanding how to evaluate safety domain-by-domain, especially for people with no fallback, we plan to create evaluations in these high-stakes domains. How does AI guidance fit in with people’s broader information diet? …
… Opportunities for engagement on AI safety Anthropic supports international AI safety dialogue with AI experts in China, when possible. The world has a vested interest in safe AI, regardless of where it is developed and deployed. …
… Footnotes For GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Pro, we compared against the best reported model version available via API in the charts and table. …
… Paul Christiano stepped down in April 2024 to take a new role as the Head of AI Safety at the U.S. AI Safety Institute . In January 2026, Kanika Bahl stepped down to begin a new nonprofit, the AI Access Initiative , and Zach Robinson stepped down to focus on non-profit and philanthropic work. …
… They are mistaken: the questions raised by AI are bigger than the AI research community, not just in their implications, but also in their nature. AI systems are not engineered the way a bridge or an airplane is engineered. …
… In this post, we want to expand on our perspective on AI and biological risk biorisk . It is striking—but not necessarily intuitive—that every safety framework released by frontier AI labs includes some reference to biorisk. …
… By bringing together the Stainless and Anthropic teams, the Claude Platform continues to push the frontier of developer experience and agent connectivity. …
… Note that Mythos Preview remains the best-aligned model we’ve trained according to our evaluations. Our safety evaluations are discussed in full in the Claude Opus 4.7 System Card . …
… It sees, for example, the force-push, the deletion, and the infrastructure change. What it gets wrong is whether a real consent signal in the session actually covers this action. "Clean up the PR" was said by the user, but it doesn't name force-pushing. …